[DEVASYS - Development of an Online Tool to Support Systematic Evaluation of Intervention Projects in Prevention and Health Promotion]. / DEVASYS ­ Entwicklung eines Online-Tools zur Unterstützung der systematischen Evaluation von Interventionsprojekten der Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung.

OBJECTIVES: To date, knowledge about the effects and implementation quality of disease prevention and health promotion projects in Germany is limited. Only a few structured evaluation systems exist that can be easily used and which include features for evaluating research and practice projects. The aim of the current project was to develop and carry out a pilot study of an online evaluation tool that enables structured self-evaluation of projects in disease prevention and health promotion practice and contributes to an improved documentation and cyclical development of projects. METHODS: The mixed-methods approach taken in this project included 2 steps: a) search of literature and database to develop a theoretical framework for the tool and b) adaptation process to test the fit of the tool for practice, including a focus group discussion and a usability test with different disease prevention and health promotion stakeholders (N=12). RESULTS: The resulting documentation and evaluation system (DEVASYS) is comprised of the components "planning", "documentation", and "evaluation" which can be used independently of one another. The conceptual basis of the tool is the RE-AIM framework. To determine the quality of an individual project, dimensions of both the output (reach, acceptance, implementation) and the outcome levels (effectiveness, maintenance) can be documented with the tool. CONCLUSION: DEVASYS is a practice-oriented tool contributing to an improved evaluation of existing practice-related intervention projects and the overall quality of future projects in the area of disease prevention and health promotion. Systematic dissemination and implementation of the tool are the next steps to be taken.

Lifestyle changes are related to reductions in depression in persons with elevated coronary risk factors.

This observational study investigates whether persons with elevated coronary risk factors (CRFs > 3 and/or diabetes) and depression [i.e., ≥ 16 on the Center for Epidemiological Scale - Depression (CES-D)] can make changes in health behaviours over 3 months and improve depressive symptoms and other CRFs. Analyses were based on data from 310 men and 687 women enrolled in the high-risk arm of the Multisite Cardiac Lifestyle Intervention Program, targeting diet (10% fat), exercise (3 h per week) and stress management (7 h per week). As expected, at study entry, depressed persons had a more adverse medical status, consumed more dietary fat and practiced less stress management than non-depressed persons. To examine 3-month changes, participants were grouped into (1) depressed persons who became non-depressed (CES-D ≤ 16, n = 248; 73%), (2) persons who remained or became depressed (CES-D > 16, n = 76) and (3) non-depressed persons who remained non-depressed (n = 597). All persons, regardless of group, met program goals. The greatest improvements (i.e., diet, exercise, perceived stress, hostility and mental health) were observed in Group 1 relative to Groups 2 and 3, which did not differ from each other. Comprehensive lifestyle changes appear to be feasible and beneficial for initially depressed persons with elevated CRFs.

Social support group attendance is related to blood pressure, health behaviours, and quality of life in the Multicenter Lifestyle Demonstration Project.

Changes in coronary risk factors, health behaviours, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) were examined by tertiles of social support group attendance in 440 patients (21% females) with coronary artery disease. All patients participated in the Multicenter Lifestyle Demonstration Project (MLDP; eight hospital sites in the USA), an insurance-covered multi-component cardiac prevention program including dietary changes, stress management, exercise and group support for 1 year. Significant improvements in coronary risk factors, health behaviours, and HRQOL were noted at 1 year. Several of these improvements (i.e. systolic blood pressure, health behaviours, HRQOL) were related to social support group attendance, favoring those who attended more sessions. The associations between support group attendance to systolic blood pressure and to four HRQOL subscales (bodily pain, social functioning, mental health, and the mental health summary score) remained significant when controlling for changes in health behaviours, but dropped to a non-significant level for the HRQOL subscales 'physical functioning', 'general health' and 'role-emotional'. These results suggest an independent relationship of social support group attendance to systolic blood pressure while improvements in quality of life may be in part due to improved health behaviours facilitated by increased social support group attendance.